User talk:66.99.240.2

September 2013

Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Honorific have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lil Durk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. STATic message me! 15:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Romeo + Juliet has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Romeo + Juliet was changed by 66.99.240.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962821 on 2013-11-21T15:34:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to El Paso, Illinois appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Amp71 (talk) 02:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kelly Shore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 2013-10-07}}</ref> undergoing [[Orchiechtomy|orchiechtomies]] and Kimber James and [Danielle Foxxx]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=27022 |title=Danielle Foxxx Has a "Penisectomy"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Albert Einstein in popular culture, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Albert Einstein in popular culture with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Albert Einstein in popular culture with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Albert Einstein in popular culture with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Albert Einstein in popular culture may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• jpg|thumb|The famous image of Einstein]]'''Albert Einstein''' has been the subject of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Albert Einstein in popular culture, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 19 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Cook County Sheriff's Office page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm Rhododendrites. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to OTF because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  16:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at OTF. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: OTF was changed by 66.99.240.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966317 on 2014-05-12T16:11:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cesar Zambrano. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. GiantSnowman 12:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hakham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jim Zulevic— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:58, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Jim Zulevic with this edit. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Judy Smith, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 17:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---