Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 May 11
May 11
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 11, 2009
Israeli art students
Delete and salt. Continually redirected to a 9/11 incident which, in fact, isn't called by that name. The 9/11 section conflates two or three alleged or suspected incidents by Israeli artists or art students. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Delete Its a Hell of a lot more then "two or three incidents," however (more like hundreds, as can be discerned here: http://www.antiwar.com/israeli-files.php). But that will be addressed when I write the relevant article. In the meantime, this useless redirect should be done away with. Oh, and it should be noted that this redirect page was originally created as a redirect to Culture of Israel, presumably in order to direct people from what they were actually looking for (as I find it simply implausible that any person of reasonable intelligence could possibly have thought they were being helpful when they created such a redirect; why would a person looking for Culture of Israel search with the phrase "Israeli art students?"). KevinOKeeffe (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Phrenectomy
A phrenectomy is the surgical removal of the phrenic nerve, which is not related to a frenectomy.Jasonbholden (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, due to spelling error. blurredpeace ☮ 19:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Change redirect to Phrenic nerve. I've added the word to the existing text about it in that article.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Retarget to phrenic nerve per Fabrictramp.--Lenticel (talk) 08:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Azala
Completing this nomination for User:Janke, who appears to have had trouble with the procedure. As seen here, his reason appears to be "redirect pointed to wrong article". I have contacted Janke with a pointer here to leave any further comments that he wishes to make. My own opinion on this redirect appears below. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. "Azala" is mentioned at the target as the owner of a plot of land described on what is probably the oldest map still in existence, which makes this a reasonable redirect. Although there are a few other things named Azala, this is the most important usage. Moreover, if the target is disputed, that's not a reason for deletion. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nom, comment: I have goofed... The reason I nominated is that I somehow found myself at what appeared to be an Azala language wikipedia ([1] via "check usage" on Commons images), then looked for "Azala" on enwiki, and got redirected to ancient history and a single reference to "a person called Azala"... Looking into this, i now see that it is the "Euskara" language wiki that confused me. Sorry, I withdraw the nom, and have restored the redirect. But maybe we should have an article named "Azala"? ;-) --Janke | Talk 07:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Glueless connection
Delete this misleading redirect. As far as I know the term "glueless connection" is completely unrelated to wireless networking (and isn't mentioned on the target page). Tobias Bergemann (talk) 06:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, I agree that glueless connections don't have anything to do with wireless networks. MichaK (talk) 19:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)