Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frame, Set & Match
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 23:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frame, Set & Match (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability for 5 years. Searching turns up more on a picture framing shop in London. MB 18:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. Business with less than 50 people. The reason why it has remained unreferenced for 5 years is because they are so hard to find, this being one of the few. Solid WP:A7 case but worth running the AfD to help prevent its return. Britishfinance (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Colin M (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.