Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L-Boyz Record

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

L-Boyz Record

L-Boyz Record (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 01:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

• weak delete - I found no sources to indicate that this meets GNG, or is notable by record label standards (notable artists, impact on genre or culture), but I note that sources are likely to be in Arabic, which would be difficult for me to find. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 04:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

• Delete -- smallish labels are rarely notable and this one misses the mark. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.