convitelivo.com.br Convitelivo.com.br

   
Convite vazio

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Convitelivo.com.br?

• 1.66E-5% of global Internet users visit Convitelivo.com.br

How many people visit Convitelivo.com.br each day?

• Convitelivo.com.br receives approximately 820 visitors and 986 page impressions per day.

How much Convitelivo.com.br can earn?

• Convitelivo.com.br should earn about $4.02/day from advertising revenue.

What is Convitelivo.com.br estimated value?

• Estimated value of Convitelivo.com.br is $3,717.52.

What IP addresses does Convitelivo.com.br resolve to?

• Convitelivo.com.br resolves to the IP addresses 34.232.37.174.

Where are Convitelivo.com.br servers located in?

• Convitelivo.com.br has servers located in Ashburn, Virginia, 20149, United States.

convitelivo.com.br Profile

Title: Convite vazio
Edit Site Info

What technologies does convitelivo.com.br use?

These are the technologies used at convitelivo.com.br. convitelivo.com.br has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Miscellaneous
LottieFiles LottieFiles
Operating Systems
Ubuntu Ubuntu

convitelivo.com.br Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 820 visitors daily, generating a total of 1K pageviews. This equates to about 24.8K monthly visitors. Convitelivo.com.br traffic has decreased by 99.99% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors820
99.99%
Monthly Visits24.8K
99.99%
Pages per Visit1.20
33%
Visit duration00:13
Bounce Rate80.69%
33.33%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
820
Monthly Visits:
24,846
Pages per Visit:
1.20
Daily Pageviews:
986
Avg. visit duration:
00:13
Bounce rate:
80.69%
Global Reach:
1.66E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
3
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
25,113
HypeRank:
n/a
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,497,908
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
100.00%
Referral:
0%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
0%
Mobile:
100.00%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

50K
DEC
248.5M
JAN
24.8K
FEB
Last update was 1 hour ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 23 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with convitelivo.com.br in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
3

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  convitelivo.com.br
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $120.6 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $3.7K.

How much would convitelivo.com.br make?

Daily Revenue:
$4.02
Monthly Revenue:
$120.60
Yearly Revenue:
$1,467.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

How much is convitelivo.com.br worth?

Website Value:
$3.7K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
convitelivo.com.br
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
convitelivo.com.br
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
convitelivo.com.br
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is convitelivo.com.br hosted? ▼

Convitelivo.com.br may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
34.232.37.174
ASN:
AS14618 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Ashburn
Virginia, VA
20149
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 34.232.37.174

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does convitelivo.com.br load? ▼

The average loading time of convitelivo.com.br is 94 ms. The Desktop speed index is 97 and mobile speed index is 95.
Average Load Time:
94 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

97
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 78% 21% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 21% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)817ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 71% 24% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 24% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 77% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 82% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 78% 21% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 21% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)817ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 71% 24% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 24% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 77% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 82% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 0.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

95
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)822ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 73% 20% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 61% 27% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 27% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)246ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 70% 12% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 12% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 17%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 74% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)822ms 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 73% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 61% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 61% 27% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 27% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)246ms 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 70% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 12% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 17%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 74% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11%

Lab Data

Speed Index 4.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint 2.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 2.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 2.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does convitelivo.com.br use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on convitelivo.com.br are reduced by 71%.
convitelivo.com.br use gzip compression.
Original size: 4.15 KB
Compressed size: 1.19 KB
File reduced by: 2.97 KB (71%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. convitelivo.com.br supports HTTPS.
 convitelivo.com.br supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: convitelivo.com.br
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid from: Jun 1 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jun 30 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Aug 23 22:26:04 2022 GMT
Valid until: Aug 23 22:26:04 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Organization: "Starfield Technologies, Inc."
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, US
Issuer:
Valid from: Sep 2 00:00:00 2009 GMT
Valid until: Jun 28 17:39:16 2034 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 convitelivo.com.br supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 05:23:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-length: 1216
server: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu)
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=a7kirdk7i20uduu2tkr65h5ldt; path=/
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
pragma: no-cache
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 900
Mname ns-862.awsdns-43.net
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 52.70.198.240 11
A 34.232.37.174 11
NS ns-862.awsdns-43.net 3551
NS ns-1490.awsdns-58.org 3551
NS ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk 3551
NS ns-418.awsdns-52.com 3551

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on April 9, 2018 and will expire on April 9, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Livo App. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 16, 2024.
Domain Created:
2018-04-09
Domain Expires:
2026-04-09
Domain Updated:
2024-01-16
Domain Age:
6 years 26 days
Domain Registrar:
Livo App
Domain Owner:
Allezyshop Company Informacao e Tecnologia Ltda -
WhoIs:
 

% Copyright (c) Nic.br - Use of this data is governed by the Use and
% Privacy Policy at https://registro.br/upp . Distribution,
% commercialization, reproduction, and use for advertising or similar
% purposes are expressly prohibited.
% 2025-04-05T02:24:11-03:00 - 108.178.0.234

domain:      convitelivo.com.br
owner:       Allezyshop Company Informacao e Tecnologia Ltda -
ownerid:     24.207.121/0001-77
responsible: Alexandre Figueiredo Freitas Santos
country:     BR
owner-c:     TAMAX4
tech-c:      LIAPP3
nserver:     ns-862.awsdns-43.net
nsstat:      20250331 AA
nslastaa:    20250331
nserver:     ns-1490.awsdns-58.org
nsstat:      20250331 AA
nslastaa:    20250331
nserver:     ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
nsstat:      20250331 AA
nslastaa:    20250331
nserver:     ns-418.awsdns-52.com
nsstat:      20250331 AA
nslastaa:    20250331
saci:        yes
created:     20180409 #18231263
changed:     20240116
expires:     20260409
status:      published

nic-hdl-br:  TAMAX4
person:      Taciano Maximo
e-mail:      email
country:     BR
created:     20170610
changed:     20240116

nic-hdl-br:  LIAPP3
person:      Livo App
e-mail:      email
country:     BR
created:     20180409
changed:     20180409
provider:    GODADDY (86)

% Security and mail abuse issues should also be addressed to cert.br,
% respectivelly to email and email
%
% whois.registro.br only accepts exact match queries for domains,
% registrants, contacts, tickets, providers, IPs, and ASNs.