Jump to content

Talk:ACEA agreement

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Last major car market in the world?

[edit]

"With 18 million cars sold each year, Europe is the last major car market in the world." What is that supposed to mean? Is there something missing?--Boson 12:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering that as well. Have tagged it with a "clarify" sticker, who knows, maybe the original author will come back and tell us (unlikely given that it's stood for 5ish years now), or someone with better powers of telepathy than me or thee can rewrite it into more understandable language. However, the data is probably long out of date by now anyway. 193.63.174.211 (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It occurs to me that there could be 'rge' missing from the middle of 'last'. Just speculation but it would make more sense. Of course, even if it was the largest in 2007, it may not be any more; I might suggest doing some research there. If it's not the case, probably delete the line - there's no point to it if no-one can make head nor tail of it. CarrieVS (talk) 11:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CO2 equivalents as L/100km and MPG?

[edit]

As the grammes-per-kilometre metric is worked out from each car's performance on the combined euro-standard economy test, would there be any mileage (ha-ha) in putting one or two guide figures in place to show what each major level or target relates to in those terms? I could even work it out roughly, given that 99g/km is 74.3 MPG UK (3.8 L/100km) (...for diesel?), an oft-quoted figure in manufacturer literature...

With that:

  • 80g/km = 3.0L/100km (92.9 MPG UK) diesel, 3.3L/100km (83.3 MPG UK) petrol
  • 95g/km = 3.6L/100km (77.4 MPG UK) diesel, 4.0L/100km (70.1 MPG UK) petrol
  • 120g/km = 4.6L/100km (61.9 MPG UK) diesel, 5.1L/100km (55.5 MPG UK) petrol
  • 130g/km = 5.0L/100km (56.6 MPG UK) diesel, 5.5L/100km (51.3 MPG UK) petrol
  • 140g/km = 5.3L/100km (53.1 MPG UK) >>> "5.8L/100km for petrol and 5.25L/100km for diesel engines" it says in the article text... so my figures are for diesel, then, and petrol is 99g/km at 67.3 MPG UK or 4.2L/100km? That just doesn't seem to fit with what's published in the press, but let's roll with it.
  • 165-170g/km = 6.3~6.5L/100km (43.7~45.0 MPG UK) diesel, 6.8~7.0L/100km (39.6~40.8 MPG UK)
  • 186g/km = 7.1L/100km (39.5 MPG UK) diesel, 37.3 MPG UK petrol
  • (And then appropriate conversions for US MPG? 80g/km = 70.3 MPG US, 100g/km = 56.3, 120 = 46.9, 140 = 40.2, 167.5 = 33.6 and 186 = 33.5...)

Which is a bit more relatable for the everyday reader, if made a bit clearer than the above table (which has evolved a little over the past 15 minutes as I've come into a better understanding of the figures). All we have at the moment is the figure for 140g/km, lurking up near the top of the article.

It also suggests it's not all doom and gloom ... although e.g. my own car is supposedly rated for 110g/km (67.5 MPG UK), and it only typically achieves 51~54 MPG (136~144g/km) in real world driving, that's still a major improvement on my previous one (rated at 165g/km, 44.8 MPG; achieving 33~36 real-world, though as I went from petrol to diesel that's equivalent to 36~40 MPG, 185~205g/km?). Given that it was built in 2003 with already good power and emissions levels (both of which have improved in current models, with a modest but proveable (by other people I know... O.R. I know...) boost in realworld economy as well), shows it's not only possible and practical but that manufacturers are, and were achieving it in mass-market models. Just consumers chose not to buy them for some reason (being convinced maybe that they needed more power than they really did? fear of diesel?)

BTW, is the mileage really different for petrol and diesel? It seems to get quoted the same for both fuel types in manufacturer's figures. Maybe they've got it wrong... I would expect so, given the different calorific densities of each fuel etc. But then which of the two is 74.3 and which is -whatever the other figure works out to be-? 193.63.174.211 (talk) 11:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on ACEA agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ACEA agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ACEA agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ACEA_agreement&oldid=1197139346"