Jump to content

Talk:Ajax (programming)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleAjax (programming) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 26, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 14, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ajax (programming). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Date

[edit]

I'm afraid I don't have the skills to edit this page but I fear it's now fairly out of date -- for example, it says that "simple devices (such as smartphones and PDAs) may not support the required technologies", which I think is no longer true, and describes Fetch as "a new native JavaScript API" although it's now at least 5 years old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidoaye (talk • contribs) 10:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, also Ajax has mostly been superseded by the SPA, as shown on its article - maybe that should be mentioned here? Cylinderwheat (talk) 15:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax framework

[edit]

What is an Ajax framework ? I expected clicking on a link to Ajax framework would tell what an Ajax framework is. However, clicking on that link currently redirects me to this Ajax (programming) article. The word "framework" only occurs once in this article -- in a link in the "See also" section to "List of Ajax frameworks". --DavidCary (talk) 04:07, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

[edit]

Is it "Asynchronous JavaScript + XML" or "Asynchronous JavaScript and XML"? I've always understood the latter.

But the article by Jesse James Garrett has it as "Asynchronous JavaScript + XML". OTOH, the MDN page has it as "Asynchronous JavaScript and XML", and moreover explicitly indicates the "a" standing for "and". And the MDN page claims that Garrett coined the term, but Garrett's article doesn't claim he did, but merely states that "we at Adaptive Path" have been using the term. So it could be the case that it was originally coined as "and" but it was mistranscribed (possibly via a handwritten note) along the way to Garrett's article. After all, it seems a bit odd not to have the "a" standing for "and".

In any case, we have two sources contradicting each other on the matter. How can we resolve this? — Smjg (talk) 00:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did start as "Asynchronous JavaScript + XML" but quickly became "Asynchronous JavaScript + X". This is all confused as the original APIs mentioned XML, but were used for other purpose.

Given an API to dynamically fetch other bits from Javascript, suddenly broke open an entire world. (Replaced a complex Windows application with an AJAX application around 2007.) pbannister (talk) 02:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbannister: Sorry, I had missed your reply until now. So the 'a' was added to make it pronounceable as a word, and that it is also the first letter of "and" was pure coincidence?
Furthermore, I note that the API seems to be data-format-agnostic, despite the class name XMLHttpRequest, so I can understand the change from "XML" to "X". Maybe it was originally conceived with the assumption that the data sent and received would be in XML, but then it was realised there's no reason it needs to be. Still do you have any further information about this change? Furthermore, does anyone actually own the acronym? If not, I wonder who would have been responsible for changing what it stands for. — Smjg (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of name

[edit]

yes, im aware of what the acronym stands for, but software developers often work puns into their names. since Ajax is a dish detergent, might this technology ... maybe just maybe .... be a tribute to SOAP? 👀 —Soap— 13:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ajax_(programming)&oldid=1263603170"