Talk:Anasuya Bharadwaj
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 October 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article temporarily protected.
[edit]Because IP edits have continually made bad edits to the page (for example, making unnecessary individual links to every word in a phrase), this page is locked until such conduct stops. IPs may suggest edits to the page here. bd2412 T 19:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Can you identify three sources that show that this subject is notable? To pass WP:NBIO these references need to show significant coverage, from a reliable source and must also be independent of the subject. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Here are some sources in English language: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10], and [11]. If you ask Telugu users, they could find sources in Telugu language.TamilMirchi (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- That's more than three - could you kindly pick the three best ones. Thee good sources are enough. --Salimfadhley (talk) 01:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- I reviewed the first three articles you listed. They all seem to be recycled press-releases with a publicity photo. These are not significant coverage and they are not independent of the subject. --Salimfadhley (talk) 01:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Do these count? [12], [13], [14], [15], and [16].TamilMirchi (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- The first is a single paragraph, so not "significant coverage", 2nd one is better since it's a long-form tabloid article about an actors history. Third article is not independent because it is an interview article, simply reporting what the subject said about a matter. My point here is that most of these links seem to be tabloid junk and not the sort of thing we can infer notability from. --Salimfadhley (talk) 09:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Do these count? [12], [13], [14], [15], and [16].TamilMirchi (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles