Talk:Auckland volcanic field

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Auckland Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion

discussion here please before surgery moza 12:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had thought my edit summary was clear enough. In hindsight, it would have been better to to explain my reasons for the deletions more fully here. I removed two external links, Map of Mangere Mountain and Map of Mount Eden, and an "Internal links" section listing links to Mount Eden and Mangere Mountain, all recently added by Mozasaur.

Since Mount Eden and Mangere Mountain are part of the Auckland Volcanic Field category, and the full category is only a click away, I saw no point in listing just two of the category members here. However I would support adding a full list of the volcanoes in the field, including those we don't have articles for yet, because this adds some information beyond what the category provides.

The maps were of the Mt Eden and Mangere suburbs, not of the corresponding volcanoes, so the title of at least the Mangere map was misleading. And while part of Mt Eden (the volcano) was shown in the upper right corner of the Mt Eden map, the Mangere map did not show Mangere Mountain at all. So even if we retitled these links, I didn't feel they would be relevant to this article. (They might be useful additions to the articles for those suburbs, though.) -- Avenue 23:46, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added a list of volcanoes in the field. -- Avenue 15:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Likelihood of new eruptions

I heard it bandied about on the radio and in the breakroom that the estimated likelihood for another eruption in the field is about 1 in 500-1000 years. Anyone got a cite for that? MadMaxDog 05:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not exactly an estimate, but the Contingency Plan for the Auckland Volcanic Field says that "the return period between past events has ranged from hundreds to thousands of years." (page 4) -- Avenue 08:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of map requested

Someone has requested that the map at the top of this article be deleted. If you have an opinion on this, please comment here in the next 7 days. -- Avenue 01:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First volcanoes

i need to know what were the first two volcanos that erupted in auckland.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.6.238 (talk • contribs) 17 March 2013

http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/1199/city-of-volcanoes says Onepoto and Pupuke. Nurg (talk) 09:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox

This topic would lend itself to a navbox. Any idea how to group the volcanoes? Schwede 66 17:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: I would be happy to help with this if I can. Would simple north, east, south, and west divisions (with a separate line, perhaps, for island volcanoes) be appropriate? — Hugh 02:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hl: I've started a navbox at User:Schwede66/sandbox. I take it you know something about the subject area, and which one would go where. Have a go at completing it and we can then move it into template space. Adding it to individual articles is easiest done by AutoWikiBrowser; happy to do so when it's all done. Any questions, please ask. Schwede 66 05:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: I've done this, and changed to a different photo. What do you think? — Hugh 23:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hl: The links for the group names aren't right (the CBD is much too tight; West Auckland is an electorate). Once that's sorted, I'll move it. Schwede 66 23:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: I can't find appropriate articles; I'll remove the links. — Hugh 23:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Now at Template:Auckland volcanic field. Schwede 66 00:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Auckland volcanic field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050827175307/http://www.rsnz.org:80/publish/nzjgg/1996/119.php to http://www.rsnz.org/publish/nzjgg/1996/119.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Maps

There is a rendering bug as of late 2022 in the software engine that prepares a pgn format thumbnail of maps to reduce server load. If a so rendered map does not show expected detail just slightly change the default size of image in pixels and all should be well. ie if intended width 250, change to 249. ChaseKiwi (talk) 19:35, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]