Jump to content

Talk:Johnson Wax Headquarters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johnson Wax Headquarters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]

The Johnson Wax Headquarters
The Johnson Wax Headquarters
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 693 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 01:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 22:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Johnson Wax Headquarters/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 18:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm GhostRiver. I'll be reviewing this article against the good article criteria. By doing so, I am earning points for the WikiCup and the January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive. Although a quid pro quo review is not necessary, it is appreciated. You can see what open good article nominations I have here.

I will go through the article section by section checking it against the criteria. Once I have finished my review, I will place the article on hold, giving you seven days to respond. If you need more time, just reach out! While I'll always put the article on hold once it's ready for you to look at, you may start making changes before I complete my review. — GhostRiver 21:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

[edit]

Site

[edit]
[edit]

Development

[edit]

Original building

[edit]

Opening

[edit]

Research Tower expansion

[edit]

Post-completion

[edit]

1950s to 1960s

[edit]
  • SC Johnson erected a large plastic globe outside the headquarters in 1954. Why? (Synthesize from source)
  • The theater was rededicated in July 1967 and initially screened the film To Be Alive! and hosted SC Johnson meetings. Awkward semi-run on. Specify that the film screening was for the dedication and separate out the meetings.
  • The Research Tower's floors were originally painted red, but each pair of floors was repainted over the years to prevent confusion. Assume this means each floor was painted a different color? Please specify.

1970s to 1990s

[edit]

2000s to present

[edit]

Administration building

[edit]

Exterior

[edit]

Interior

[edit]

Research tower

[edit]

Exterior

[edit]

Interior

[edit]

Impact

[edit]

Reception

[edit]

Media

[edit]

Landmark designations

[edit]

Exhibits and architectural influence

[edit]
[edit]

General comments

[edit]