Jump to content

Talk:Lanka Sama Samaja Party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

I think it is clear due to the foreword that the text is an approved text by the leadership of the party, making it not a neutral article. Electionworld 22:35, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

But this article is helpfull you to expand it.

Thank You.

A very interesting and informative article. But completely and more or less uncritically pro-LSSP. I would suggest to the the editor who posted this that it be sent to the Marxist Internet Archive where it can be placed in the Encyclopedia of Trotskyism On Line part of that site. The MIA is the largest non-group archive of marxist literature on line, prestigious enough to be mirrored by the British Library, and would be a far better home for this article than this wiki.

Jock Haston

I think the original is from Leslie Goonewardena's Short History. I added some of the remaining bits. V 220.247.243.12 03:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An omission

[edit]

Glancing over this article, I find that the most striking characteristic of the history of this political party has been overlooked. In the 1930s following Trotsky's expulsion from the Soviet CP, his followers around the world were also expelled from every local CP -- except in Ceylon, where the Trotskyites were numerous enough to turn the tables! I believe this was something of an embarassment to the Soviets until the fall of the Berlin Wall. -- llywrch 19:46, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

its a remarkable historic feature, but n ot quite that simple. the original LSSP was neither Trotskyist or pro-Moscow. It was a broad, general socialist (even social democratic), with a somewhat ecclectic nature. Once the Trotskyists were able to take over the party, the pro-Moscow wing was expelled. The Trotskyists were, however, not particularily numerous. Rather the party as a whole was very small. I don't think it was particularily embarrasing to the Soviets, as 1) the CP established itself as an equal to LSSP quite quickly and 2) LSSP was, for a trotskyist party, quite pragmatic in international relations. LSSP joined the same broad fronts as the CP and its youth wing was attached to the Soviet-dominated WFDY. --Soman 19:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article could have given you the wrong impression. The founders of the LSSP included a large core, perhaps a majority, that had been won to socialist ideas by the Trotskyists while students in Britain. The LSSP was the only [mass] workers party in Sri Lanka: because it was the first and only it was natural that socialists of all trends should find themselves drawn towards it. Because a core element of the Trotskyist strategy in the Second World War was the defence of the Soviet Union, and since the post-war strategy was to ensure the Trotskysists were in the same mass party as the broad masses, it's not that surprising. The departure of the 'Stalinists' was fundamentally about their own political needs, rather than any Trotskyist take over: the pro-Stalin current around Keuneman wanted to collaborate with the British war effort, which much of the LSSP did not. This is nicely explained in a 1964 article by Ernest Mandel. --DuncanBCS 20:36, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I object to the last passage. The split between USP (which evolved into the CP) and LSSP occured before UK and Soviet were allied, and USP leaders like S.A. Wickremesinghe were jailed by the British for their opposition to the war. --Soman 21:25, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, you are right about the timing. The CP was founded after the change of line, the USP was founded before then. I've struck out that last comment. Thanks for your correction! --DuncanBCS 21:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(1)To say that 'the CP established itself as an equal to LSSP quite quickly' is an exageration. Electorally, the LSSP was always at least twice as strong and it was the hegemonic force in the trade union movement. It even had an underground presence in the armed forces until 1966. Nobody ever seriously considered the CP to be anywhere near as powerful as the LSSP.
(2) I think that the seriousness of the Trotskyism of the LSSP is being undervalued here. Trotskyism is not measured merely in terms of international relations, but also in activism. The CP always followed the Moscow line and compromised often. The LSSP was grounded on the principal of workers' democracy and its core party and broader support base understood this. Even before entering the coalition government in 1964 the party felt the necessity to theoretically justify this in terms of the class nature of the SLFP and to have this approved before a party conference.
(3) The LSSP was not the first workers' party. The first was the Ceylon Labour Party of AE Goonesinghe (in which R Premadasa started out). However, the LSSP was the only party consistently to fight for independence in what was basically a white-racist society; compromise in the 2nd world war meant compromise with white racism, which is why the CP was never able to obtain the mass base enjoyed by the LSSP. Trotskyism was measured by activist vis-a-vis Stalinism in concrete terms such as these. Vinodm 02:00, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent points. Very interesting. Did the Ceylon Labour Party reach mass proportions? --DuncanBCS 08:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Labour Party was quite large and mostly had influence among the urban working class. It merged later with the UNP.Vinodm 10:14, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gcsuslkmayday60.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Gcsuslkmayday60.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lanka Sama Samaja Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lanka Sama Samaja Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revamp

[edit]

Hi. I've gone ahead and revamped the page, fixing spelling mistakes and punctuation, as well as adding images. The page is now fully cited too. Feel free to let me know if there's anything factually incorrect or that needs changing. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:34, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lanka_Sama_Samaja_Party&oldid=1227847561"