Talk:Noggin (brand)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Noggin (brand) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Nickelodeon Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as High-importance).

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Some variant section

I think we should use the base 1999 logo instead of the Nick/Sesame Workshop logo, and add a variant section for the many other variants, mainly because that Nick/Sesame Workshop logo isn't the main version and it'd be better to use the blank one, the main version.

If we do use a separate section for other versions, it should go under logo/branding. Wikisplat (talk) 14:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think we can add more logos to the page because they would be non-free files. Wikipedia can only use very limited non-free files.

Even though there were many logo variants, the Nick/Sesame Workshop logo is the one from the "What Is Noggin" promo that Noggin chose to represent itself, and is a pretty basic logo instead of a holiday one or something. I think it also helps new readers, since it shows who the founders of the channel were. I remember a brand guide for Noggin (maybe the Articulating Noggin pdf) saying that the logo shouldn’t be used without a topper, so I don’t know if using the base part of the logo is a good idea… Squittens (talk) 00:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can't the founders go into the userboxes? If they wanna know who the founders are, they can read the infoboxes Wikisplat (talk) 20:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

should it say "was" yet?

It was announced only yesterday and it doesnt look like noggin is gone yet. Should it say it was or is? Jatanea (talk) 20:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shall we keep the "is"?

Paramount still owns the trademark. 47.36.211.22 (talk) 22:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not only that, but the official noggin.com website is apparently "rebooting" 2607:FEA8:6565:5200:8ECC:6BA6:6E22:84C2 (talk) 00:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can we change the short description to “Former American children’s edutainment brand (1999–2024)”

I know this page was protected, but can we please make it say “Former American children’s edutainment brand (1999–2024)” so that way we know Noggin’s former. 2600:1004:B0BF:15E1:5947:EC4C:612F:13F1 (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well as far as I can tell the article doesn't actually discuss that Noggin has stopped operating. When there are some reliable sources supporting that, the short description can be updated for good. I suggest "Former American children’s edutainment brand". Commander Keane (talk) 20:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, do that! 😊 157.23.249.80 (talk) 00:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some variant section

should it say "was" yet?

Shall we keep the "is"?

Can we change the short description to “Former American children’s edutainment brand (1999–2024)”

zproxy.org