This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates
It is strongly disputed in the UAE today that the local tribes, pearl fleets and seafarers, disputing maritime dominance with the British, should be characterised as 'pirates' - a label that makes them faceless and strips their identity as neatly as 'terrorists'. They were the fleets of independent emirates operating under the rule of local law, with rulers and tribal structures of governance. Because they disputed British rule, they have been labelled pirates rather than, for instance, being called Al Qasimi - which is the confederation of leaders and emirates that stretched at the time from Sharjah to Ras Al Khaimah, across to Lingah and other Iranian ports under Al Qasimi control.
So I have replaced 'pirates' with 'Al Qasimi', for it is precisely Al Qasimi they were. I have also added a link to Sultan Al Qasimi's fascinating book on the subject which does not dispute Al Qasimi ACTION but postulates that refusing to bow to British will or force was in itself not an act of piracy but one of resistance. I have, to be fair, noted that the British charge was one of piracy... Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:19, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]