This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AstroHurricane001.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Opponents to world domination dismiss it as a form of fascism, and frequently use invalid arguments such as reducio ad hitlerum to describe its inefficacy. In the highly complex world of human erudition, both supporters and critics of world domination assert that individuals cannot control the course of world progress, regardless of how history or progress is defined.
On a purely intellectual level, world dominance can be achieved by memorializing all the countries of the world, yet this creates the problem of de facto countries and micronations, all of which deserve eternal judgement and salvation. Most proponents of world domination have Swiss bank accounts. They are more likely to experience annoyance toward religious topics.
Wikipedia editors can use reliable sources to make these connections, although the chains of cause-and-effect are indeed very complex. This is a great way for us encyclopedians to educate the world. Just try to avoid undue synthesis and original research.
What does free really mean? Is it an unbound significance, freedom of the mind to transcend barriers, or simply the very nature of the Internet? Everything nowadays seems to be institutionalized. Yet Wikipedia, just by its logo, signifies a vast collection of puzzle pieces, for to assemble an infinite puzzle. Some may say it will never be completed, but then again, neither is the very essense of human knowledge. You see, humanity stands at a tipping point, not because of some aforementioned doomsday, but rather the awakening of its peoples. We have come to realize that the omnipresent barriers, seemingly brick walls, are all but façades created by the illusion of their own presence. Impenetrable, as they say, but neither the human mind nor the creative works of such can be unsurmountable as such. All it takes is a little psychological resilience. We live within such a web, the portrayal of communication, the lacking of context as we suffer the news fatigue of the day, not willing to take a moment to remember. Yet what is there to remember, despite the vast cacophony of bogged-down memorization and little else to seek, that which is here? Well, who knows, and how, for that matter. All I know is that this is a reminiscence of purpose, the very purpose of purpose itself, as well as Wikipedia, without context, which of course, is ultimately unnecessary, for this is a run-on sentence. Time is ticking, yet your mind is becoming faster. The infinite train continues to chug on, as the corollary of the human existence meets its unrivalled end, that is, a new beginning. You see, every minute is the end of something, and the beginning of something, and it is your mind that decides which exists the resemblence of hitherto unknown polluted references. Just make sure to cite your sources. Good luck. Your journey awaits.
We stand to face the politics of politics, the nature of nature and the knowledge of knowledge itself, both within and without. NPOV, therefore, is simply an omnipresent tone of voice, without necessitating an actual omnipresence amidst an uncountable infinity. As within, so as without therefore.
Hi! Welcome to my user page. I have been an editor on this community project for six years, and I am rather highly experienced on Wikipedia, recently being listed on Most active Wikipedians (warning: link may freeze slower browsers). I've worked on articles relating to many different topics here, and contributed to regular updating of current event articles, reverting vandalism, helping out in discussions and projects, and more. Some of my work has also focused on improving specific articles, and building them to higher levels of assessment ratings. My editing sometimes declines and other times picks back up, as real-life duties often limit my time for editing. However, there are still times for rapid editing sprees.
Nowadays, I do some article planning, rather than just pure article expansion and updating. One issue we currently have in our featured articles is that the addition of new content sometimes renders the remainder of the article unreadable. Sometimes it is necessary to refactor content so that only the most important facts and information, displayed alongside references of course, is displayed on a top-quality article. As I also said several years ago, long-term Wikipedia editing is likely to result in noticeable health effects, of which a significant portion of mine I attribute to Wikipedia. Still, I wonder how netizens in the Arab countries seem to be able to better mitigate their use of time, rather than get bogged down on tedious to-do lists that have replaced much of the Western lifestyle.
Thus, in order to upgrade the project in new ways, I suggest the use of techniques for expanding article topics and improving quality. One would be having a conceptual outline for new articles, and then collecting relevant information that fits the article according to such an outline. Techniques may be entirely independent, rather than rigid or strictly determined by the associated WikiProjects. Some contributors would argue that Wikipedia is failing to meet its goals, while others would state otherwise; certain people also suggest that Assume Good Faith has become meaningless or that "Be Bold" hardly attracts newcomers. I would argue for a balanced approach, including making use of insightful discussions on project pages, rather than standard routine Watchlisting which does get boring after a while.
Want suggestions for articles to edit? Please enter your username here.
I use the username "AstroHurricane001" on WeatherUnderground, as well as within the Imaginova community websites.
Committed identity: 9b45618ddf41fad3210a6ace155e1f137c32321475519280a3931b1c365bfb0e6b5f386079ad48de9736d1229cb87d4f6b518ee43322b6afaf3be81b1d29141a is a SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
What I do here
I do a wide variety of editing on Wikipedia, in many namespaces. You can check my contributions here. I have also contributed to three Did You Know?s {}, and made several successful nominations for In the news {}.
Articles created
I have created 62 extant articles/stubs on the English Wikipedia. The purpose of this list is mainly to keep track of what I might work on:
Please do not read this if you do not understand what a wiki-philosophy is. These are not set in stone. This applies to Wikipedia only and not to anything else.
I just recently started creating my own userboxes, so I put them here. These Userboxes don't affect the Userbox subpage. Some userboxes are in subpages that are not linked.
For being the 50th person—a special landmark, indeed—to sign my guestbook, I, La Pianista, hereby present you with this award. Cheers! —LaPianista!«talk» 00:24, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
The MOTD Barnstar
I hereby award this Barnstar to AstroHurricane001 for his excellent contributions to the Motto of the Day project. The mottos you have been suggesting recently have been appropriate, insightful and inspired. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for signing my guestbook! Reading details carefully is a quality more people should have. -download|sign! 19:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
The MOTD Barnstar
This award is given to you for helping out Motto of the day. Thanks to your effort, MOTD has brilliantly and successfully passed the most difficult period of the year. In fact, there are mottoes scheduled until the end of the summer. For this reason MOTD would like to express heartfelt thanks to you for your support. We appreciate your efforts in further helping the project! – delivered by Simply south on behalf of Wikipedia:Motto of the day 18:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
If you'd like to show off your awesomeness, you can use this userbox.
The Nessie Barnstar
Awesome job on the Signpost interview! Gniniv (talk) 09:16, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
For useful and constructive contributions in diverse areas of the project, and for being a dedicated, all-around great Wikipedian! ;) Ϫ 08:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
The MOTD Barnstar
I award the MOTD Barnstar to AstroHurricane001 for helping to keep our project "alive" during this difficult time. Without you and your so precious help and contributions, we all probably would have seen the end of this project. A BIG THANK YOU!!! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 19:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
For your recent increased activity at the Reference Desks
Please accept this Physicians for a National Health Program poster in kind thanks for your recently increased great work at the Reference Desks. I couldn't help but notice the increased number of answers you've been providing recently. Dualus (talk) 04:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Awarded to AstroHurricane001 for participation in the 2011 WikiCup.
The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
The Original Barnstar
This Barnstar is for you for creating the "Cyclone Funso wiki page" Typhoonwikihelper (talk) 12:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
This is for you!~why? you commented on my page! Typhoonwikihelper (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
OMG ~ how did you know i was laughing?! ◕‿◕ Typhoonwikihelper (talk) 07:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For acknowledging my small contribution and encouraging me to submit more photos, I hereby award you this barnstar. Robthepiper (talk) 06:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
}, and made several successful nominations for In the news {
}.
C
