User:FlyingKiwi/Dash
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 2804:f14:80a5:d301:fd8b:4076:fbba:8b28 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 177.76.41.247 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Being very rude; giving me a fake 4im warning in my talk page, as well as calling me ¨blind¨ in an edit summary Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, ULTRAKILLing Vandals! Call for Medic! My Stats! 21:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)- @Ahecht Thanks, will do. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, ULTRAKILLing Vandals! Call for Medic! My Stats! 22:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 1 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 5 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 10 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- S()mebody set up us the B0Mß (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- InterestingPeopleAndPlaces (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Queerbagel (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "queer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file the use of the word "queer" is not necessarily offensive please consider the context -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Parker.cat (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- MístníHajzlovéHaroldOJJMusíDoKrimynálu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- CrystalVioletIodineComplex (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Free2rhymes09 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Free2Rhymes (at least from what i googled) seems to be a soundcloud rapper. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, ULTRAKILLing Vandals! Call for Medic! My Stats! 15:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2ybrand (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See https://2ybrand.com/ Johnj1995 (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- SAGAR HOTWANI ( an Indian businessman ) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Staraction (talk | contribs) 13:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. It looks like the user confused creating an article with creating an account. If they are the named person, the username is fine(though a bit odd with the parenthetical part). If they're not, that's different, but we should try discussion first. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- AccademiaDiCucinaItaliana (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. GPL93 (talk) 15:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Veracitymedia (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. GPL93 (talk) 16:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- BKcom123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Theeartofproductionllc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Apparently self-promotional content. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Renamed user ac0b14054c6dc44a12cf041c1e627da6 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)– Violation of the username policy as it looks like an IP adress. Also the user is engaged in a dispute, himself opened an incident claim here that was against him, and he changed his username claiming "clean start" just go back to the article in question to revert again (I guess to avoid 3RR)Rpo.castro (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rpo.castro Not a violation of the username policy. That is the standard form of username used in the account vanishing process. They were renamed to that by a global renamer and then their account was globally locked. No edits have been made since the name was changed. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rpo.castro
- Fortifsere (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (fortifsere.fr). —Bruce1eetalk 22:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Skitash (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Continuous additions of non-existent articles by IPs; in this case, redirected pages about media franchises, which if more of this type were added would take up unnecessary space for the purpose of the template BrookTheHumming (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- I concur with Brook for temporary semi-protection; this navbox is only meant to have full-fledged franchise articles, not section redirects. An IP user has recently been trying to add Anastasia (franchise) to the navbox even though it only redirects to a section in the article for the 1997 film, which is not the intent of the template. –WPA (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Daniel Case (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple edits due to transfer rumors to Aston Villa which is unannounced, Requesting edit protection until end of transfer window 1st February IrishReader1996 (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one edit today after a couple of reasonably quiet weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 23:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Anonymous editor hopping between multiple IP addresses, dating back to 5 January 2025. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined First, the user appears to be on a /64, which should not be taken to imply by itself they are deliberately hopping IPs. Second, they haven't been warned in five days—contrary to what too many people here may think, it is not self-evident from being reverted that you're doing something wrong, at least not to new editors. Third, not all of their edits have been reverted (although you are right that most of those have been on the article in question. Fourth, if they are a sock, who are they a sock of? Being on a /64 where your ISP dynamically assigns your IP address does, as I said above, make you a sock. Daniel Case (talk) 23:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Mixture of vandalism, good faith nonconstructive editing, and the occasional constructive IP edit. Has been semi-protected on and off for the better part of five years - might be time for a long-term solution. Entranced98 (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article apparently being vandalized by students. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 19:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request indefinite extended confirmed protection, same thing with The Blooodline, WP:OR, disruptive editing and constant vandalism. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] If you have nay question please let me know in the reply below. Lemonademan22 (talk) 19:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Persistent disruptive IP editing when unprotected Firecat (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP editor keeps removing content from the page. O.N.R. (talk) 22:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent addition of a non-existent "Kageff Fire". EF5 23:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Let's lock this up and get all these IPS to the talk page discussing why we use this terminology. Ongoing problem for months.... Moxy🍁 23:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 00:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 7 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Aidillia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) In Buried Hearts, there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was first deleted but later recreated and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until GreenLipstickLesbian fixed and requested a revision deletion today. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Wikipedia is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.
- It also appears to be that Labor Attorney Noh Moo-jin had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. Aidillia(talk) 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Thanks for your interest in the permission, but the copyvio occurred last week and is a serious concern. I don't quite follow your explanation for it, so I'm not able to look past the concerns. arcticocean ■ 21:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pseud 14 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets the minimum criteria, and the majority of their creations have passed a quality content review. It's been a little bit since the last creation, but I believe this editor has demonstrated enough familiarity with the policies and guidelines surrounding new articles that input from NPP will not be needed in the future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Cmacauley (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Cmacauley has been an editor since 2007, meets all the required criteria, and would likely benefit from having the AP right granted. This editor currently has 59 live articles and has only had one article deleted. They have consistently produced well-referenced, high-quality articles, with the majority receiving B-class ratings. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Done. One adverse consideration was this warning for violation of copyright. I'm prepared to look past it: the warning was issued in 2019 and nothing recurred while the user has been highly active since then. arcticocean ■ 21:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Anon423 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been around for some time, am quite familiar with tough conversations at the Teahouse or IRC (though I've sadly been inactive at the latter for a while) with new editors excitedly pushing their (often promotional) new articles, and do occasionally write new articles, 53 so far. I might as well not clutter the new pages queue. — Anon423 (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done arcticocean ■ 21:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- SiniyaEdita (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed Titus Joseph Mdoe and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ojsyork (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- Unblock-un on hold (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Unblock-un on hold (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I assume this is based on this being a doppelganger, even though it's name has no relation to the name of your other claimed account? In order to establish that both accounts are controlled by the same person, please make a post here with the original account confirming the connection. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 23:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't know which template to use instead of {{doppelganger}} but i changed it now Qrstw (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – You are now confirmed. I've temporarily added the confirmed permisssion for one month, which should be sufficient for it to become autoconfirmed. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 21:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't know which template to use instead of {{doppelganger}} but i changed it now Qrstw (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- CommunityNotesContributor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Leaning towards no, mainly on account of a lack of demonstrated need, but willing to be overruled or persuaded otherwise. Primefac (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- As an example; I'd be able to close this RM if there is no consensus, as I did the previous that lacked consensus, but I wouldn't be able to if there was consensus. The one I closed had sat in the backlog for almost two months. CNC (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hameltion (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I find myself not infrequently asking at RM/TR to move drafts over existing redirects with bits of history; I'd appreciate being able to do that myself. I also like taking in part in RMs and would like to be able to help with more than just the easiest closes. Thanks. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not seeing a huge need but do agree there is a fair amount of RM and RM/TR experience. Short trial is probably on the table, will think on it. Primefac (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done for three months. Primefac (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Intrisit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Gwanki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done You do have a lot of experience, but I'm not really seeing relevant experience as it relates to what this tool is for. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 22:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- TheAstorPastor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting this to assist with reviewing edits. I am fairly active on this platform and occasionally handle edit requests. I have made significant contributions to articles, including List of things named after Julius Caesar, which I have nominated for FL. I have also participated in some AFDs and believe that I am eligible for this. The AP (talk) 10:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 22:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Cameremote (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As a relatively new Wikipedia editor, I quickly grasped the core principles and ideology of the encyclopedia. With over 500 edits and several articles created, I have made steady progress, and at my current editing rate, I project to reach 30,000+ edits by the end of 2025. The Pending Changes Reviewer privilege would provide me an opportunity to my broaden efforts against page vandalism and ensure accurate, stable, and reliable content. I sincerely appreciate rejections or acceptance given my understanding, however, please endeavor to leave any explanation if you deem it fit to reject. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 15:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Some of your recent edits give me serious doubts that you are ready for any sort of advanced permissions. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 22:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- JurassicClassic767 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
It works in tandem with reverting vandalism and it can be a good alternative for tackling possible vandalism or content that's not appropriate for Wikipedia. I'm already familiar with vandalism policy and handling inappropriate edits as I'm a rollbacker. Additionally, I'm very familiar with Wikipedia's content policy, given that I've been editing for around 5 years now. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 21:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 22:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As I also do recent changes patrolling, having this permission will extemeley help me with combatting vandals, as edits requesting review can be viewed on the Recent Changes page, which will help me.
Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 23:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Closed Limelike Curves (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I know this may come as a bit of a shock, but I'd like to request the "pending changes reviewer" permission so that I can review some pending changes. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- TrueMoriarty (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello? TrueMoriarty (talk) 09:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ampil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.
Note: The bot becoming silly, and marking as already done.
Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 12 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "reviewer" user right. — MusikBot talk 05:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Zanahary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been editing for a few years now and I have a good enough grasp on Wikipedia's policies to warrant this permission. I want to be able to keep protected pages maintained and updated. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 20:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- BryceM2001 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- SmittenGalaxy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'd like to request pending changes reviewer so I can review pending changes, as it'd help alongside doing vandalism patrol. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 08:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been patrolling the recent changes page for a long time now, and it's pretty much the only thing I do on here (other then occasional copyediting.) When I learned about rollback and its benefits, I thought that could be a huge help for me and patrolling against vandalism. I love patrolling, and this will make my life so much easier.
Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 20:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320, is there something in the Simple Wikipedia you may like to reconsider? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- What do you mean? ive only done 2 edits to the simple wikipedia
- 1 to the ultrakill page
- 2 to my user page Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- oh wait i know what you mean. ill change that. @ToBeFree Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done, i just copy n' pasted my userpage from the main wikipedia over to the simple. @ToBeFreeTenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- oh wait i know what you mean. ill change that. @ToBeFree Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- NotQualified (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights
Hello! I routinely go to the Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection when I spot vandalism. I believe this would make the process of resolving issues faster. If you need links to my requests, I can provide them! If there is more things I could do, please tell me. NotQualified (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links