User talk:Danielklein

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Discussion to prevent overzealous editing was derailed and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,

Welcome!

Hello, Danielklein, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Alan Au 03:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Proposed merger

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I see you have proposed a merger of Lucas number into Lucas sequence. I think there are very good reasons why the articles should not be merged - I have explained these reasons on the articles' talk pages. If you want to consult other editors who are active in the mathematics area of Wikipedia you could mention the proposed merger on the WikiProject Mathematics talk page. Gandalf61 09:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Danielklein!

I'd like to second what Gandalf61 just said. Please mention proposed mergers of two math articles on the [[math talk page before tagging the articles. Things will probably go more smoothly that way. Anyway, I don't think the proposed merger is a good idea, for reasons I've explained both here and here. Have a great day! DavidCBryant 12:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bottersnikes and Gumbles.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bottersnikes and Gumbles.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 14 (1952)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 14 (1952), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Isaac_Asimov_Presents_The_Great_SF_Stories_14_(1952). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 15 (1953)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 15 (1953), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Isaac_Asimov_Presents_The_Great_SF_Stories_15_(1953). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 16 (1954)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 16 (1954), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Isaac_Asimov_Presents_The_Great_SF_Stories_16_(1954). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 18 (1956)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 18 (1956), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Isaac_Asimov_Presents_The_Great_SF_Stories_18_(1956). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:41, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Zynaps animated logo.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Zynaps animated logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Danielklein! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. S. A. Wakefield - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Tony Barber (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of S. A. Wakefield

The article S. A. Wakefield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not meet Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature#Criteria for inclusion. A google search failed to find reliable sources to support this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tea with toast (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup this Saturday

	Melbourne Meetup Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:25, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)

Sinhala language

Kwamikagami, Danielklein --

Under "Writing system" we see "Sinhala also knows hal kirama and uses two differing virama symbols depending on the basic grapheme to explicitly indicate the lack of a vowel." Could one of the knowledgable editors please clarify this? I get the impression that virama symbols are sound-killers, but I could find nothing on "hal kirama". (I assume "knows" in this sentence should be "recognizes" or "uses".) Thanks -- Jo3sampl (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Copy edited. — kwami (talk) 00:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup

Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)

February Melbourne Meetup

Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks mate!

	Page fixing
	Hey mate, I reversed that page on Ruby Payne-Scott but missed the two dollars! Thanks for fixing that up! Karl kloppenborg (talk) 23:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Penny (Australian)

You left a message on my talk page in 2010: "Where does your information about the penny being withdrawn in 1991 come from?" The Swedish Rounding page used to have this factoid on it; it has since moved to Coins of Australia. All I did was mirror the information on a more useful spot.

Better late than never! Derek Chong (talk) 02:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colour names in Sinhala and English, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Accent support

Hi Daniel. This is the only way i could figure to contact you. please forgive me if it is inconvenient. i am new to wiki. I found your input regarding the Australian accent very helpful. I am an American Actor in Melbourne (married an Australian) working on my AU accent so I can get involved over here. I want to write out my parts phonetically but feel overwhelmed as to where to start. The needs affected are my being able to contribute creatively and my need for support. Would you suggest a starting point, or perhaps I could buy you a cuppa and pick your brain. Best Wishes Karl karljlinder@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kleedo (talk • contribs) 03:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

Proposed deletion of Vicnet

The article Vicnet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 13:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Isaac Asimov Presents The Golden Years of Science Fiction, Fifth Series for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isaac Asimov Presents The Golden Years of Science Fiction, Fifth Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Asimov Presents The Golden Years of Science Fiction, Fifth Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 00:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Danielklein. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Danielklein. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Danielklein. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Danielklein. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

How are your "linking here" reports?

Wikipedia:Teahouse#How often does "What links here" get refreshed?

Did the index of articles linking through templates get correctly refreshed finally? --CiaPan (talk) 11:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

@CiaPan: The cronjob seems to run every half-hour. I've managed to update a lot of the links via a single edit in the appropriate template. Thanks! Danielklein (talk) 03:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

@CiaPan: I was wrong. The cronjob seems to run every quarter-hour. Danielklein (talk) 04:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called How often does "What links here" get refreshed? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Moved from article talk

Hi, I removed the following post which said

What I mean is that no evidence or line of reasoning has been presented for IRV giving voters multiple votes. I find this claim interesting (although ridiculous) and would like to know more about it. I.e. how could anyone think that it could be true? Danielklein (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Two other editors (including me) had already explained that our talk page guidelines limit article talk pages to discussing article improvements, and they are not just for chatting about issues. You're welcome to post ideas for improving that article, based on reliable sources. Thanks NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Can you please put something in the article about how one voter can have more than one vote or remove it as an unverified statement? Danielklein (talk) 13:47, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your interest in IRV! I'm not sure precisely what the issue is but I am interested in hear your thoughts. At article talk, please quote the text you are talking about. A good way to quote is to use Template:tq. (click that link to see the syntax). I will look for follow up at article talk. Good to meet you. The learning curve here is somewhat steep, but there is a lot of help available to those willing to accept it. Sounds like you are. Welcome NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Articles with Sinhala-language external links

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with Sinhala-language external links requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

@Liz: What was this category for? What articles used to appear in it and why is it empty now? --Danielklein (talk) 22:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called Sri Lankan film and actor articles at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called Lack of evidence of notability of Sri Lankan films at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleting Sinhala films

I noticed that you are going to delete Sinhala film articles, James Bond and Bindu (already). I got your point. So there is no any offence about deleting James Bond film. However, it is not fair with the film Bindu. Because, the film has received positive reviews from critics, as well as nominated in many film festivals and won some awards. Therefore, as you said earlier, the film is noteworthy to include here. Because, it has some importance. If any Sinhala movie has positive or negative critic review or award nominations, I do not think it is good to delete. Reconsider about it again. I hope you will get the point.

Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 10:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Gihan Jayaweera, I have detailed my rationale on Bindu's talk page. I have no issue with notable Sri Lankan films being included on Wikipedia (and they don't need to be notable internationally, being notable only within Sri Lanka is good enough). In fact, I would love to see more good articles on Sri Lankan topics on Wikipedia as I have an interest in Sri Lanka, particularly the Sinhalese people and Sinhala language. I will be proposing more films for deletion as I find them. This is not a criticism of your work. You can ping me on each film's talk page to discuss the notability of that particular film, as it's not appropriate to get into the details on a user's talk page. --Danielklein (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called Is it possible to see the pages that send the most traffic to another article? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Gihan Jayaweera

Hi, please note that @Gihan Jayaweera: is an autopatrolled editor, that means his article creation record has been examined and approved by admins. I have also seen a number of his articles and consider that they pass WP:GNG so if you continue to target his articles I will be opposing your actions as in my opinion they are invalid, also I believe you are harassing him more than helping him, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called Are user created imaginative illustrations Original Research? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called PROD notice removed without due diligence - what now? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

——Serial ^# 10:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Arbcase "Discussion to prevent overzealous editing was derailed" Declined

In response to your request for arbitration of this issue, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact a member of the community if you have more questions. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 16:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Best procedure for improving statements that don't have references, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

User category proposed deletion

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)