User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2022/January
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lee Vilenski. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Happy New Year, Lee Vilenski!
Lee Vilenski,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 12:46, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive |  |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
Merchandise giveaway nomination
|
A token of thanks
Hi Lee Vilenski/Archives/2022! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
|
 |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stephen Maguire
The article Stephen Maguire you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Stephen Maguire for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
boldavoid query
Hiya Lee, Happy New Year! I noticed you removed the link bolding on the 2022 Masters page, and just wondered what Boldavoid is? The reason I ask is because I proceeded to update numerous Masters articles to use that format, making the assumption that such formatting was agreed upon a while back but not consistently applied on future wiki articles and I had not been aware of the Boldavoid rule. Part of my premise to doing that is that we had a number of older Masters articles doing this (2005 to 2013) and thought that having the format like that would be consistent. I noticed that our Good Articles don't do tthis, but also use what seems to be an unfavoured "formatting" for referring to the sponsor (ie "the XXXX Masters (officially the XXXX sponsor Masters)"), but I'm not sure how we should proceed on that? Do we want to update everything to the format used from 2005 to 2013 (sans unnecessary link bolding) for consistency reasons, or is this something you'll want me to raise on the Project talkpage? --CitroenLover (talk) 16:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi! See WP:BOLDAVOID. We should never really place links in bold. The ones that we use on GAs are the correct way to deal with this. I'm not sure where you got the idea that it was unfavoured though. The bolding of links in the titles is used in the majority of our articles, but that doesn't make it right. I change them when I work on an article, but I'm not making a pass through several thousand events to make it unilaterally. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ah I see, gotcha. My reasoning for "it was unfavoured" was precisely due to the GA's not using that format. Going forward, if I see bolded links in the lead, I'll correct that [also I'll probably look at making the format used on Masters articles more standard with the "XXXX sponsor tournamentname", instead of "XXXX tournament (referred to as XXXX sponsor tournament for sponsorship reasons)" stuff. --CitroenLover (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- I would say the later is probably the one that is most in keeping with the policy. The links is the bit that annoys me most. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Could you link the policy so I can better understand how leads are meant to be written on snooker articles (regarding the sponsorship stuff) and not make any mistakes when updating articles? I've read through most but I wasn't able to find this specific one. Only reason I comment on it is because I think it was talked about vaguely on the Project talkpage recently, where I might've seen the comment about it? --CitroenLover (talk) 21:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- It was discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker/Archives/2020/August. My understanding is that XXXX Masters (also known as XXXX Sponsor Masters) is the best solution and the one suggested by the discussion. By all means open at topic to get it clarified. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for that link. I'll take a read through that, and I'll certainly open a topic for clarification. Those edits I've made to the Masters articles, I've mostly reverted to a similar format that was used on a couple of GA's, so shouldn't cause any issues now. Thanks again!! --CitroenLover (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- No issues. I'm happy if there is a consensus. Just don't want those FA articles to get played around with too much unless we get one. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:12, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for that link. I'll take a read through that, and I'll certainly open a topic for clarification. Those edits I've made to the Masters articles, I've mostly reverted to a similar format that was used on a couple of GA's, so shouldn't cause any issues now. Thanks again!! --CitroenLover (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- It was discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker/Archives/2020/August. My understanding is that XXXX Masters (also known as XXXX Sponsor Masters) is the best solution and the one suggested by the discussion. By all means open at topic to get it clarified. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Could you link the policy so I can better understand how leads are meant to be written on snooker articles (regarding the sponsorship stuff) and not make any mistakes when updating articles? I've read through most but I wasn't able to find this specific one. Only reason I comment on it is because I think it was talked about vaguely on the Project talkpage recently, where I might've seen the comment about it? --CitroenLover (talk) 21:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- I would say the later is probably the one that is most in keeping with the policy. The links is the bit that annoys me most. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ah I see, gotcha. My reasoning for "it was unfavoured" was precisely due to the GA's not using that format. Going forward, if I see bolded links in the lead, I'll correct that [also I'll probably look at making the format used on Masters articles more standard with the "XXXX sponsor tournamentname", instead of "XXXX tournament (referred to as XXXX sponsor tournament for sponsorship reasons)" stuff. --CitroenLover (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
GAN
Hello. I saw that you undid my reviews for Good Article status. I know I wasn't perfect and that it would be undone. Anyways, I want to go over one with someone so that I can do other reviews with ease. Can you please teach me one so I know what to do? Thanks. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
Miscellaneous
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-en
lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
Disambiguation link notification for January 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Survivor: Cook Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Second Hundred Years' War on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Glossary of chess on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
DYK for 2021 UK Championship
On 6 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 UK Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during a match at the snooker 2021 UK Championship, player Mark Williams fell asleep? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 UK Championship. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2021 UK Championship), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abortion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
New voting tables
I think we should just leave the way they are They look good They are easy to read And the new one leave out information about the castaway’s previous tribes I’m sure any person who goes on this would learn how the tables work They have been like this for years and it has been fine We you getting complaints or something I get changing the jury table but the voting table now looks ugly and has very little information 173.76.253.196 (talk) 14:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, IP user. The information is already explained elsewhere in the article, including the colours in the table. This falls foul of many Wikipedia policies, especially MOS:COLOUR. Something being wrong for many years is not a reason to have it remain so. Please do not revert this. There is already consensus in the form of policy against this tabling, so reverting is a type of vandalism at this stage. We are also WP:NOT an encyclopedia of all information on a subject. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Quarter Million Award
|
The Quarter Million Award |
| For your contributions to bring Deep Blue (chess computer) (estimated annual readership: 251,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks for your work on this vital article! – Reidgreg (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the WST Pro Series
Heya Lee. Given that the WST Pro Series will not be making a return, and was simply a one-off tournament to fill a hole in the 2020-21 season, I feel that we should probably just move 2021 WST Pro Series to its redirect title of WST Pro Series and simply specify that the tournament was a one-off addition to provide additional earning opportunities. Granted, I don't think we will find a source for much of this tournament or the future of it, since many consider it to be a non-event (best of 3's aren't going to count in head-to-head stats from the broadcasters) with no real meaning for anything, but is it worth doing? --CitroenLover (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see we need to change the title. This isn't the only event that's ever been held just once. So long as it meets GNG, there's no issue.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ah fair enough. Thanks for the insight! --CitroenLover (talk) 20:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Poaceae on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrator advice
Hello,
can you take a look at my contributions to give me advice for me to become an administrator? I noticed that you were on the list at [1] and so I just wanted to ask you. Thanks. Severestorm28 04:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi! Severestorm28 - I'd be happy too. Could you give me a couple days to check your contributions out? I'll then send you an email, if that's ok? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that's fine. Thanks! Severestorm28 12:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Just checking, is it going okay so far? It has been a few days... Severestorm28 12:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that's fine. Thanks! Severestorm28 12:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Gloomy In the news
I know the nature of the Main Page means that such coincidences will happen, and will normally resolve themselves within a day or so - so mainly an observation. Jackiespeel (talk) 20:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Brian Rose (podcaster) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
DYK for 2022 Masters (snooker)
On 26 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 Masters (snooker), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that referee Jan Verhaas was informed of an error he made at the 2022 Masters by a member of the crowd? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 Masters (snooker). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2022 Masters (snooker)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Devolution in the United Kingdom on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Asylum (1981).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Asylum (1981).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DYK for Deep Blue (chess computer)
On 29 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deep Blue (chess computer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Garry Kasparov thought that a move by chess computer Deep Blue demonstrated its "superior intelligence", but the move was in fact caused by a software bug? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deep Blue (chess computer) 2. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Deep Blue (chess computer)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.