User talk:Shunpiker
Smile!
[edit]
A NobodyMy talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron
[edit]| WELCOME | from a Article Rescue Squad member | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Welcome to Article Rescue Squadron Shunpiker, a dynamic list of articles needing to be rescued, which changes with new updates, can be found here:
I look forward to working with you in the future. Ikip (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Welcome to the rescue squadron. I have been around for almost 4 years, and I know most of the terrible bureaucracy here on wikipedia. If you ever have any questions, just consider me your mentoree, and I would be happy to help you. Ikip (talk) 00:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with your setiments entirely. Please enjoy some wonderful articles about how the media universally feels that deletionsionism is deterimental: Wikipedia:Notability/RFC:Reevaluation#Journalists then enjoy my research, showing that articles for deletion disportionally effect new users: User:Ikip/AfD_on_average_day Ikip (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
| The Rescue Barnstar is awarded to people who rescue articles from deletion. This well deserved barnstar is awarded to User:Shunpiker, for his work saving articles for deletion, particularly Mr. President (title) You are a real asset to the project. Ikip (talk) 10:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC) |
Welcome to ARS!
[edit]
Hi, Shunpiker, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron WikiProject! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles and content that have been nominated for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable, and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles and content to quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again — Welcome! Addbot (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC) | ||||
Hey. Can you please help me finish this article that I started. Thanks. --Mapple001 (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
GUatemala
[edit]Thats, great. Hopefully more people will become involved with it soon as there is a massive amount missing. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Harold Sirkin book reviews
[edit]i understand that positive reviews might be taken as puffery, (one was critical "This is not a question contemplated by the authors".) and detract from the article. i have no great like of management consultants and their puffery, i am concerned that blanket statements are made in AfD, that are easily proven false. the quotes prove the sources are not trivial (the next argument), it was probably an over-reaction on my part to:
The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. - No evidence
when it only took me five minutes, confirming THF: "The article is a mess, but I question whether anyone did the required search for sources". you could edit them done if you want, but please leave until the AfD is finalized. the article is better sourced than the Tom Peters one, but he was better at marketing? more visible in popular culture - oh and when the verifiable sources do it, it's not NPOV, they could argue synthesis though (except that the sources agree) pohick (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Cloudbuster merge
[edit]I've started a discussion on Orgone and added the appropriate tags. TBH I think a merger is not without merits and should be discussed, but that merging without discussion is not appropriate. Artw (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- (replied on User talk:Artw)
- Also if Verbal continues reverting, or if other users start reverting on his behalf then taking the matter to AN/I immediately is the best course of action, to prevent any ridiculous silliness of the kind that happened on the Orthomolecular psychiatry merge. Artw (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- I had not been involved with amy merge.redirect discussions on the talk page, not do I think it was a consensus to do so. Since that "discusion" doid not take place, the information and article should be immediately returned so that a discussion should indeed take place. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- (replied on User talk:MichaelQSchmidt)
I very strongly support keeping these articles separate. If you read the deletion discussion, I believe that the people arguing to merge are not addressing the points I raised and the sources that I linked to. People should not be able to bully others into getting their way just through a majority of numbers and unfounded assertions. Cazort (talk) 18:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- (replied on User talk:Cazort)
- Yes, exactly! personally, I have absolutely no interest whatsoever in Orgone as I think it is essentially B.S. (although I certainly think it's notable and worth having an article)...whereas I find the Cloudbuster article more interesting, even if it's based on disproven pseudoscience, just because of what it is trying to do. Cazort (talk) 19:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Dan Schlund
[edit]The decision to delete the article Dan Schlund is now being reviewed. You have been sent this message because you have previously been involved in the AfD discussion(s) concerning this article. If you are interested in the review discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 April 3. Thank you. Esasus (talk) 15:48, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Re:Literacy rate in Template:Infobox Country
[edit]I would fully support a renewal of my proposal to add literacy rate, and I think you do have a very good point to argue. However, other than a few comments here and there I don't think I'll be able to help much in contributing to the argument as I am quite busy these days. I would suggest you make a point on the fact that there are no other indicators of education in the template and also prepare to argue against the range of data in the List of countries by literacy rate page. --Hamster X 18:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Hoaxes?
[edit]Hello - I noticed you picked up on my tagging an article as a possible hoax. Is there more that I specifically should do? Do you have a good link for me to learn more about how to handle a hoax? I am a fairly new editor and appreciate your confirmation and actions. Alice (talk) 13:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- (Responded on User talk:Alice.haugen -- Shunpiker (talk) 16:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC))
Candidate for rescue? Kittybrewster ☎ 14:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: E. T. Barnette
[edit]I see what you mean about a naming controversy. The source I'm using to build the article about the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner refers to him as Ebenezer, but given the sources that you've cited, I've got no problem if you switch the article back to E.T. JKBrooks85 (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'll ask Terrence and Dermot when I see them again. JKBrooks85 (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on User talk:JKBrooks85. -- Shunpiker (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Afd Article
[edit]Thanks for your help cleaning up the Nancy Jacobson article. Ultimately, a decision was made to keep the article[1]. However, the person who originally requested deletion (Jeandré du Toit) went ahead and pretty much blanked the page anyway. It looks like someone is pretty determined to remove or whitewash this article, and aside from monitoring it 24/7 for deletion and heavy editing, I'm not sure what else can be done. I've dropped AfD a note too, but still wanted to say thanks here and make you aware of how things turned out. cheers. --Nacl11 (talk) 16:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- (replied on User talk:Nacl11) -- Shunpiker (talk) 00:12, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Again, thanks. It was good to find someone who was of similar mind about the content. I'm sort of a beginner here, and it just struck me as odd that admin interventions, AfD committee evaluations, and evidence of bad faith are all basically cast aside once an article is open for editing by the general public. I guess my best plan of action would be to become involved in the 90% of Wikipedia content that is not controversial from here on out. cheers. --Nacl11 (talk) 06:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- (replied on User talk:Nacl11) -- Shunpiker (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Ray Mabus
[edit]Someone removed your POV tag. If you think it still applies you should post your reasons on the talk page and then reinstate it. If you think it's promotional, there is also a template for that. Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)
[edit]| The Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content | |||||
Happy Holidays
[edit]
Ret.Prof (talk) 05:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec09}} to your friends' talk pages.
| ||||
Content
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Shunpiker! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Sue Monk Kidd - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
[edit] |
Hello, Shunpiker! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! |
--Kumioko (talk) 04:08, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
[edit]
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 03:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Bain & Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chapter 7 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
[edit]The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
[edit]
| |||
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
[edit] |
New England Wikimedia General Meeting | |
|---|---|---|
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
| ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England! | ||
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.
Nomination of Fanny Imlay for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fanny Imlay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fanny Imlay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 14:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sea Peoples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aegean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard
[edit]| U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:43, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
| Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
|---|---|
 |
|
2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
[edit]You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
[edit]| NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5 | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March
[edit]| Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk) |
Invite to Corruption in Argentina
[edit]Hey Shunpiker, I noticed that you edit a lot of pages related to politics and corruption and also pages pertaining to Latin America. I spent the better part of the last two months creating the page for Corruption in Argentina, and I think it needs a fresh overview. Any chance you would be able to help? DaltonCastle (talk) 19:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
You're invited!
[edit]| NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Edit-a-thon invite
[edit]
On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!
If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.
Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons
[edit]| Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England | |
|---|---|
 As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:
We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time. If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
New England Wikimedians summer events!
[edit]| Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians! | |
|---|---|
|
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
New England Wikimedians summer events!
[edit]| Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians! | |
|---|---|
|
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
Disambiguation link notification for July 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coinage Act of 1873, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Populist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of The Principle for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Principle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Principle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Walton (talk) 20:53, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
[edit]You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
[edit]
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Shunpiker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
[edit]| Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.
We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC) | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Shunpiker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Shunpiker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
[edit].png){kind=logo}
|
US Banknote Contest |
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Writer's Barnstar | |
| Saw that you made Order of the Peacock Angel - nice job! Eliko007 (talk) 14:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC) |
You have been pruned from a list
[edit]Hi Shunpiker! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)